Overview
Mento governance empowers MENTO token holders to collectively shape the protocol's future. Through on-chain voting and community participation, governance ensures the protocol evolves to meet user nee
Mento operates as a fully decentralized protocol governed by its community. Unlike traditional financial systems where central authorities make decisions, Mento distributes decision-making power among MENTO token holders who have a direct stake in the protocol's success.
The governance system builds on proven DeFi governance models while introducing unique features tailored to Mento's needs:
On-chain execution: All governance decisions execute automatically through smart contracts
Transparent process: Proposals, discussions, and votes are public and verifiable
Time-locked implementation: Changes include delay periods for security review
Emergency safeguards: Watchdog mechanisms protect against malicious proposals
This decentralized approach ensures no single entity controls the protocol, creating a resilient system that serves its users' collective interests.
Core Governance Principles
Mento governance operates on several foundational principles:
Community Ownership: The protocol belongs to its users and stakeholders. Major decisions require community consensus through formal voting processes.
Progressive Decentralization: While fully decentralized at the protocol level, governance started with training wheels (like the watchdog multisig) that can be removed as the system matures.
Informed Decision-Making: Proposals include detailed specifications, risk assessments, and implementation plans to enable educated voting.
Aligned Incentives: The veMENTO (vote-escrowed MENTO) model rewards long-term thinking by giving more voting power to tokens locked for longer periods.
What Is Being Governed
Mento governance controls all aspects of the protocol's operation and evolution:
Protocol Parameters
Fee structures: Trading fees, rebalancing incentives, and in the future, protocol revenue distribution
Risk parameters: Trading limits and circuit breaker thresholds
Pool configuration: Adding new trading pairs, adjusting pool parameters
Oracle Management
Provider selection: Approving and removing oracle data providers
Feed configuration: Setting rate feed IDs and update thresholds
Quality standards: Defining accuracy requirements and deviation limits
Technical Upgrades
Smart contract updates: Implementing new features and optimizations
Security patches: Addressing vulnerabilities through coordinated upgrades
Integration approvals: Connecting with new chains, bridges, or protocols
Economic Policy
Emission target: Managing MENTO token distribution
Liquidity programs: Incentivizing pool participation and ecosystem growth
Governance Evolution
Process improvements: Refining proposal and voting mechanisms
Parameter adjustments: Modifying quorum requirements or voting periods
Delegation features: Enabling more flexible participation models
Governance Process
The typical governance flow follows these stages:
Community Discussion: Ideas emerge and refine through forum discussions
Formal Proposal: Detailed specifications submitted on-chain
Voting Period: Token holders cast votes over several days
Timelock Delay: Approved proposals wait before execution for security review
Implementation: Execution of approved changes can be triggered by anyone via the interface
Each stage includes safeguards and requirements to ensure high-quality decisions while maintaining efficiency.
Participation Levels
Governance accommodates different levels of involvement:
Passive Participants: Can delegate voting power to active community members they trust.
Active Voters: Review proposals and vote directly on changes they care about.
Proposal Authors: Draft and submit governance proposals for community consideration.
Core Contributors: Provide technical analysis and implementation support for complex changes.
Watchdog Members: Serve as the final security layer, with veto power over proposals that are malicious or incorrectly implemented.
All participants benefit from the protocol's success, creating natural alignment between individual and collective interests.
Evolution and Maturity
Mento governance is designed to evolve. Initial safeguards like the watchdog multisig provide security during early stages but can be removed or modified as the system demonstrates stability. This progressive decentralization ensures both immediate safety and long-term autonomy.
The governance system itself is governed, the community can vote to improve processes, adjust parameters, or implement new features that enhance participation and decision quality.
Last updated